HomeFrameworksBusiness Strategy › Scenario Planning
// framework

Scenario Planning

Pierre Wack / Royal Dutch Shell, early 1970s

A strategic tool that builds multiple plausible futures to stress-test current strategy, identifying robust actions that hold up regardless of which scenario materialises.

// description

Scenario planning constructs multiple plausible future narratives to test how a strategy would perform under different conditions. Unlike forecasting (which tries to predict the single most likely future), scenario planning accepts uncertainty and prepares for several structurally different futures. Typically, a team develops three to four detailed scenarios and then stress-tests their current strategy against each to identify vulnerabilities and robust options.

// history

Pierre Wack, a planner at Royal Dutch Shell, pioneered corporate scenario planning in the early 1970s. When Shell's scenarios anticipated the possibility of an oil price shock (which materialised in 1973), the company was better prepared than competitors. Peter Schwartz later founded Global Business Network and popularised the method through his 1991 book The Art of the Long View.

// example

A creator develops three scenarios for the next two years. Scenario A: Amazon's KDP algorithm changes significantly and organic discovery drops by 50%. Scenario B: AI-generated designs flood every coloring book and planner niche, collapsing prices. Scenario C: a new creator platform emerges and early movers capture significant market share. Stress-testing each scenario against their current strategy reveals one robust action that helps in all three: building an email list and direct customer relationships, because owned audience provides resilience regardless of which platform or market scenario materialises.

// katharyne's take

Scenario planning sounds corporate, but the core practice is something every creator should do informally: what are the three most plausible ways your market could change significantly in the next 18 months? And what would you do in each scenario? For KDP sellers, the scenarios that keep me up at night are: significant algorithm change on Amazon, major expansion of AI-generated content flooding niches, and a new competing platform disrupting the self-publishing market. What's your robust action across all three? For most creators, it's some version of "own your audience." Build your email list like your business depends on it. Because it does.

// creative uses
// quick actions
// prompt ideas
Build three plausible 18-month scenarios for my [KDP/Etsy/digital product] business. My current situation: [describe your primary income streams, platforms, and rough revenue]. The two biggest uncertainties I face are [e.g. AI-generated content flooding my niche, Amazon algorithm changes, a new competing platform]. Name each scenario, describe it in three sentences, and for each one tell me: what specifically happens to my income, what I should do in response, and what early warning signs would tell me that scenario is materialising.
Stress-test my current business strategy against three scenarios. My strategy is: [describe it briefly — e.g. building a back catalogue of niche KDP planners while growing an email list]. Scenario A: [your worst-case]. Scenario B: [your base case]. Scenario C: [a disruptive new opportunity]. For each scenario, tell me how my current strategy performs, which parts hold up, which parts break down, and what one adjustment would make my strategy more robust across all three.
Help me identify the single strategic action that is robust across all three of my scenarios. My scenarios are: [describe them in one sentence each]. Using scenario planning logic, identify which actions only make sense in one scenario (fragile), which make sense in two (conditionally robust), and which make sense in all three regardless of which future arrives (fully robust). That last category is my priority list for the next 90 days.
See also: PESTLE Analysis · SWOT Analysis · Three Horizons of Growth
← Core Competency OKRs →