HomeFrameworksDecision Making › RAPID Decision Framework
// framework

RAPID Decision Framework

Bain & Company, 2001

A role-assignment tool that clarifies who Recommends, Agrees, Performs, Inputs, and Decides on each decision — ending the stalls that come from unclear ownership in small teams and collaborations.

// description

RAPID assigns clear roles to people involved in a decision: Recommend (who proposes the decision), Agree (who has formal sign-off authority or veto power), Perform (who implements the decision once made), Input (who provides information but does not decide), and Decide (who makes the final call). The framework eliminates the ambiguity that causes decisions to stall when everyone assumes someone else is responsible.

// history

Bain & Company developed RAPID as part of their decision effectiveness consulting practice. The framework was published in a 2001 Harvard Business Review article by Paul Rogers and Marcia Blenko titled "Who Has the D? How Clear Decision Roles Enhance Organizational Performance." Bain found that organisations with clear decision roles made faster, better decisions and had higher employee engagement.

// example

A two-person creator business (creator + operations partner) keeps getting stuck on product pricing decisions. Every pricing choice triggers long back-and-forth email threads. They apply RAPID: the creator Recommends a price based on market research and positioning. The operations partner provides Input on cost and margin implications. The creator Decides (sole decision authority on product positioning). The operations partner Performs (updates the listing). No Agree role needed for routine pricing — they reserve that for major strategic decisions only. With roles clarified, pricing decisions that once took three days now take one conversation.

// katharyne's take

Even as a solo creator, RAPID is useful for structuring how you involve collaborators, VAs, or partners in decisions. The most common problem I see in small creator teams is unclear decision ownership — everyone has input, nobody has clear authority, so decisions stall indefinitely. Define who Decides on which categories of decision (product, pricing, partnerships, content, operations) before a decision is on the table. The conversation about roles is much easier when there's nothing at stake yet. By the time you're in a disagreement, it's too late to set up the framework cleanly.

// creative uses
// quick actions
// prompt ideas
Help me build a RAPID decision chart for my creator business. I work with [describe your team setup: e.g. solo with a VA, two-person partnership, small team]. Here are the five types of decisions I make most frequently: [list them — e.g. pricing, new product launches, listing copy, ad spend, customer service responses]. For each decision type, assign the RAPID roles — who Recommends, Agrees, Performs, Inputs, and Decides — and flag any where unclear ownership is currently causing delays.
I'm setting up a working agreement with a new [VA / collaborator / business partner] for my [KDP/Etsy/digital product] business. Using the RAPID framework, help me write a clear one-page decision authority document covering: which decisions they own entirely, which I own entirely, which require input from both, and which require explicit sign-off before action. Include example language I can put directly into a shared Notion doc or agreement.
Several decisions in my business regularly take more than 48 hours to resolve and I can't figure out why. The stuck decisions are: [describe 2–3 specific recurring decision types]. For each one, diagnose which RAPID role is missing or unclear — is it an Input problem (I don't have enough information), an Agree bottleneck (someone has implicit veto power), or a missing Decider (nobody is clearly authorised to close the decision)? Then tell me exactly how to fix each one.
See also: Decision Matrix · OKRs
← Cost-Benefit Analysis ↑ Decision Making