HomeFrameworksCreative Ideation › Creative Problem Solving (CPS)
// framework

Creative Problem Solving

Alex Osborn & Sidney Parnes, 1950s–1970s

Creative Problem Solving (CPS) alternates divergent and convergent thinking across four stages — Clarify, Ideate, Develop, Implement — with the Clarify stage's problem reframe often being worth more than all the ideas that follow it.

// description

Creative Problem Solving (CPS) is a structured framework that alternates between divergent thinking (generating many options) and convergent thinking (selecting the best) across multiple stages: Clarify (understand the challenge), Ideate (generate ideas), Develop (refine solutions), and Implement (plan for action). Each stage has its own divergent and convergent phase, creating a rhythm of expansion and focus.

// history

Alex Osborn laid the foundation with his brainstorming work in the 1950s, and Sidney Parnes, a professor at Buffalo State College, formalised the process through the 1960s and 1970s. The Creative Education Foundation, founded by Osborn, continues to develop the framework and hosts the annual Creative Problem Solving Institute, the longest-running creativity conference in the world.

// example

A KDP author wants to grow her income but keeps trying the same approaches. She uses the full CPS process. In Clarify, she redefines the challenge from "how do I sell more books" to "how might I become the first recommendation for KDP beginners in my niche." In Ideate, she generates 40 approaches. In Develop, she converges on a free beginner's guide published as a KDP title at $0.99, designed to rank for beginner keywords and funnel readers to her premium products. In Implement, she plans the content, publication date, and follow-up email sequence. The reframing in Clarify is what makes the plan distinctive.

// katharyne's take

The most powerful part of CPS is the Clarify stage, and most people skip it entirely. The difference between "how do I sell more books" and "how might I become the first recommendation for beginners in my niche" is enormous — one is a production question, the other is a positioning question. Before you start ideating, spend real time rephrasing the challenge. Try at least three completely different versions of the problem statement and pick the one that opens up the most interesting solution directions. That reframe is often worth more than all the ideas that follow.

// creative uses
// quick actions
// prompt ideas
Run me through the full CPS process on this challenge: [describe your current creative or business problem]. Start with the Clarify stage — give me three alternative framings of my problem at different levels of abstraction, then help me pick the most interesting one before we move to Ideate.
I'm stuck generating ideas for [my next KDP series / Etsy product line / course topic]. Lead me through a divergent ideation session — give me 20 wild, unconstrained ideas with no filtering — and then help me converge by scoring the top 5 against these three criteria: [paste your criteria, e.g. demand evidence, differentiation, ease of production].
Help me reframe this problem using the CPS "How Might We" technique: [describe your problem as you currently see it]. Give me 6 different "How Might We" phrasings of the same challenge — some narrower, some much broader — and explain how each framing would lead to a different category of solution.
See also: Brainstorming · SCAMPER · Lateral Thinking
← Exquisite Corpse Concept Fan →